Stats for past three weeks
Week Five (no interceptions!)
Week Six
Week Seven
Categories for Week Eight will be Passing Yards and Tackles.
October 28, 2009
October 27, 2009
On The Block
Yo, so I don't know if anyone would be interested, but I'm looking for an upgrade at my QB2 spot over J. Campbell. I rate Campbell as a 15-20 QB leaning towards 15, so I'm really looking for a top 10 guy if it's gonna be worth me really giving up anyone major.
The only player that I would say is off limits is Rivers. (It would be pretty pointless to upgrade one just to downgrade the other.)
I'll also say that while I'm technically willing to trade MJD, I think his value is #2 overall just behind AP. So it would pretty much take an absolute knock my socks off (not really possible, Mythbusters tested it) offer.
Other than that, anyone is available. Let me know if you have any interest.
The only player that I would say is off limits is Rivers. (It would be pretty pointless to upgrade one just to downgrade the other.)
I'll also say that while I'm technically willing to trade MJD, I think his value is #2 overall just behind AP. So it would pretty much take an absolute knock my socks off (not really possible, Mythbusters tested it) offer.
Other than that, anyone is available. Let me know if you have any interest.
October 26, 2009
Week 7 Stats
Wow...
It looks like Kyle is going to win with 282 receiving yards. But Wally has 279 and I have 277.
Tough loss...
Don't ignore David's post about Leon Washington now just because this one is above it.
It looks like Kyle is going to win with 282 receiving yards. But Wally has 279 and I have 277.
Tough loss...
Don't ignore David's post about Leon Washington now just because this one is above it.
Leon Washington
So as many of you probably know, Leon Washington broke his leg. This is devastating to my team.
However, since this is a keeper league, and he is 'keeper' type player, he retains good value(obviously not as good as it was when he was healthy). I'm interested in fielding offers for him to anyone who feels they can make an offer for a quality player and/or draft picks for the upcoming season. So... who's interested in improving NEXT years team?!
I look forward to hearing from all you guys that may be interested. Otherwise I'll be happy to stick him on IR and keep him for the next year.
Thanks,
David Hamilton
However, since this is a keeper league, and he is 'keeper' type player, he retains good value(obviously not as good as it was when he was healthy). I'm interested in fielding offers for him to anyone who feels they can make an offer for a quality player and/or draft picks for the upcoming season. So... who's interested in improving NEXT years team?!
I look forward to hearing from all you guys that may be interested. Otherwise I'll be happy to stick him on IR and keep him for the next year.
Thanks,
David Hamilton
October 21, 2009
October 20, 2009
Stats for Week Seven
The stats for week 7 will be Receiving yards and Sacks. For Josh's sake, I've gone ahead and picked the categories for the rest of the year. There is a slight advantage to one category for this year, but over the three year span this will/should even out.
I apologize that rushing yards have seemed to be ignored up to this point. To be fair Josh, this is week 7 in the first year of a three year league. There will be apparent "lopsidedness" at first, which is why you are upset. However, at any point in the three year span, as long as the categories are chosen randomly, there should be apparent "lopsidedness".
If you flip a coin 100 times, do you complain if the first 5 times are heads? No, because you know that over the course of the entire time, you are bound to get more even.
I hope everyone understands that every rule put into place has a purpose in this league, and this one is to award well balanced teams. If you are going after the 25pts for Receiving Yards, you are compromising your chances of gaining the 5 weekly points for Rushing and Passing Yards categories. That's the purpose of this. There will be some players that dominate categories. They will miss out when their chosen categories aren't picked. They will have an advantage when they are. A well balanced team can benefit every week by being competitive in each category, but not necessarily dominating any of them.
The actual numbers for past week and this week should be up soon. Should be. Soon.
I apologize that rushing yards have seemed to be ignored up to this point. To be fair Josh, this is week 7 in the first year of a three year league. There will be apparent "lopsidedness" at first, which is why you are upset. However, at any point in the three year span, as long as the categories are chosen randomly, there should be apparent "lopsidedness".
If you flip a coin 100 times, do you complain if the first 5 times are heads? No, because you know that over the course of the entire time, you are bound to get more even.
I hope everyone understands that every rule put into place has a purpose in this league, and this one is to award well balanced teams. If you are going after the 25pts for Receiving Yards, you are compromising your chances of gaining the 5 weekly points for Rushing and Passing Yards categories. That's the purpose of this. There will be some players that dominate categories. They will miss out when their chosen categories aren't picked. They will have an advantage when they are. A well balanced team can benefit every week by being competitive in each category, but not necessarily dominating any of them.
The actual numbers for past week and this week should be up soon. Should be. Soon.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)